Buildings Don’t Teach Children, Teachers Do
June 18, 2009 - Sre Chrap, Cambodia
Tooling around on a bicycle on the dusty backroads of remote regions one can find out many things. Sre Chrap is the next village, deep in the forest, about 3 kilometers away from our school. It’s a place of natural beauty and human misery. The people living here are mostly newcomers displaced to the forest for survival because their rice fields in other parts of the country have been grabbed by the government and sold off to private companies. The only means of survival is fishing in nearby Piem Levia lake and chopping down trees. The woodcutting activity is stimulated by the market for fuel wood in the city. One of the many unfortunate outcomes, aside from the stunningly ignored contribution to global warming created by the destruction of such large, old growth trees, is that the Souy hilltribe who has lived here for centuries is losing their culture. They are animist forest dwellers—without trees they have no ancestors, no medicines and no livelihoods. No one in this government seems to care.
The poverty here is quite indescribable. Along the dusty lane, lined with hut after hut, I meet school age children driving cattle, operating chainsaws, carrying babies. Girls drop out of school to be married off at 15, start having babies and begin the cycle of poverty all over again. I encounter one family squatting on the road in the shade. The mother is holding a baby, and 4 young toddlers hang around her. The oldest, a 10 year old boy, is carrying a rope for driving cattle. I ask why he is not in school. His mother said he dropped out two years ago because “the teacher absent often”. He walked a long way to go to school, and the mother needs his labor to help feed the family. For such families, sending children to school is a huge sacrifice. Keeping their children out of school oftentimes is a matter of survival, and they will give up on education quickly if they see no hope in it. Can you blame them? What treasures of talent lay behind this child’s bright eyes buried forever because no one could be bothered to pay a teacher to mine it?
The story is the same in hut after hut. One family has 9 children, 2 go to school. Girls 13 years old drop out of school for lack of a bicycle and get married. In one village only 3 children are in school.
It’s not for lack of a building. Sre Chrap has a nice, bright yellow 3 classroom school building carved out of the forest and built in 2001 by Lutheran World Services. But buildings don’t teach children, teachers do. I learned that there are more than 100 school age children in the 3 surrounding villages who are not in school.
This is just plain sad. And yet, there is community resilience. In the school yard I meet the principle, Chim Cham, a former teacher from our school at Chrauk Tiek. Four members of his school supporting committee are also present. They heard about the program from our school committee and have already created a committee with 12 members, 4 women among them. They have already been working together to do projects at the school they deem important. They’ve built a fence together with donated materials from the community, and now they are collecting materials to build the principle an office and store room. He asks if we can help support them with 10 bags of cement for the floor and tin for the roof. I am impressed with what they’ve been able to accomplish with nothing. This community deserves our support.
For the 120 students present, there are 2 teachers. They are both community teachers, which means that they live here and therefore always show up, but they have low qualifications. A young woman teaching 50 students in 1st grade has a 3rd grade education herself. An adult literacy class serves as her teaching qualification. The male teacher in charge of second grade has an 8th grade education. Third and 4th grade join together because there are so few students. They are taught by the principle, Chim Cham, the only government teacher with high school and teacher training. There is no 5th or 6th grade. Believe it or not, this underqualified teaching staff is better than government teachers because they live in the community and take the job seriously. The school committee is quite concerned about the government plans to send them qualified formal teachers from the teacher training college in the provincial capital. The result is always the same. Since the formal teachers come from far away and cannot afford to live on the new teacher salary of $30 per month, they simply don’t show up. Would you? They have no place to live, no food to eat, no social life.
Building fences and buildings is something that illiterate people can do very well. What they can’t do is build a community support system for qualified teachers. That’s why they need us. I ask the committee members what they can do to support the qualified teachers to stay here. The answer is simple—provide them housing and generate income to pay them a living wage. If they are willing to make a 5-year commitment to volunteer their time, we can help them achieve that goal.

Please help us, help them. We need a team of people to champion the community of Sre Chrap.


